The army of the Bulgarian tsardom in the period 976 – 1018. part 2.

Petyo Ivanov
 
D-r Petyo Ivanov – 20 Еlementary school „Todor Minkov“ 

 (Summary) 

 After the subjugation of the state centre by the troops of the Byzantine emperor John Tzimiskes in 971, a process of consolidation of the Bulgarian aristocracy began around the sons of Comes Nicholas. The available sources do not allow clarifying all the details about the nature of the military command until the official coronation of Samuel in 997. Three of the four brothers are attested to the role of warlords, without it being clear whether there was any hierarchy between them. The opinion that each of the brothers ruled part of the realm is not based on serious evidentiary material, but on the other hand, the statement that after the death of David and Moses, Aron was appointed to lead the military structures in the region of the Upper Struma River and the Sofia field is not without grounds. Tsar Roman, who had returned from captivity, also became part of the high command of the army, but as far as can be judged from the data in the work of Yahya of Antioch, he stood lower in the hierarchy than Samuel. After the death of the tsar and the coronation of Samuel, the practice of the high command being in the hands of the ruler of the state was restored. Despite the well-documented attempts of the Cometopouloi to continue the traditions previous to 971, there is rather a discontinuity in the field of military leadership. The kavkhan and the ichirgu boil were replaced by the heir to the throne and some individual confidants of the ruler. The military structures of the state in the period under consideration were organized on the main military-administrative areas, which became free after 971. The fortress governors, occupying an important place in the administration and in the previous period, acquired greater autonomy in making decisions related to military actions. Each of them had a personal army, which was made up of volunteers and professional units. In the peripheral territories of the realm, these commanders of fortresses were subordinate to regional governors, and it seems that in the southern limitrophe territories an organization bearing the characteristics of a military border was established. The available information leaves no room for doubt that the main source of human potential for the army was the Bulgarians themselves, inhabiting most of the realm. At the same time, soldiers were recruited from the captured Byzantine and Armenian population, as well as from the Vlachs and probably the Serbs, who also fell under the rule of the Bulgarian Tsars. 

 Keywords: Bulgarian army, military structures, Cometopouloi, Tsar Samuil, fortress governors 

 The fulltext of this article can be purchased on CEEOL

Violence against prisoners of war in the strategy of emperor Basil II to conquer the Bulgarian tsardom

Viktor Petrov

Doctoral student Viktor Petrov – Sofia University "St. Kliment 

Ohridski"

viktor.ppetrov@abv.bg 

(Summary) 


The study examines the acts of brutality against Bulgarian prisoners of war committed on the orders of Emperor Basil II in the course of his war with Bulgaria of Tsar Samuel. The historical evidence of this phenomenon is analyzed and the reasons for its appearance are sought. Based on the source data, four leading factors emerged that provoked the actions of Basil II: a) ideological/political ones: by means of such demonstrations he punished the apostasy of the Bulgarians; b) personal/emotional ones: he revenged for the taking or direct endangerment of the lives of trusted imperial generals; c) psychological ones: instilling fear in the Bulgarians; d) pragmatic ones: impetus for the sooner surrender of the Bulgarians and the prevention of unnecessary human and material losses to the detriment of the Byzantine Empire. The combination of these features became the main incentive for the violence against Bulgarian prisoners of war and significantly contributed to the rapid conquest of the Bulgarian Tsardom. 


Keywords: Tsar Samuel, Emperor Basil II, Bulgarian-Byzantine relations, prisoners of war, mass blinding

The fulltext of this article can be purchased on CEEOL 

Christian rulers in the Western, Norhwestern and Southwestern Bulgarian lands in the 15th century


Tervel Popov 
Dr. Tervel Popov – Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" 

 (Summary) 

Even though their political formations or estates were over territories inhabited mainly by Bulgarians, most of the nobles discussed in this work were from Serbian, Byzantine and Albanian aristocratic families. This can be explained by the fact that most of those territories did fall within the borders of the reestablished Bulgarian Tsardom (12th – 14th c.) for a various periods. 

It is indicative that said territories were far away from the Ottoman political centre and/or in mountainous regions where Ottomans did not exercize full control. Some of them emerged amidst the chaos in the Ottoman Empire, created by the defeat at the Battle of Ankara in 1402. 

Other lands were granted by sultans to nobles of high social standing within the Christian Balkan states who retained their positions during the Ottoman rule. In return for retaining said privileges many of the aforementioned nobles had military duties delegated to them by the padishah. 

Keywords: Christian nobles, Bulgarian lands, Ottoman rule, Macedonia 

The fulltext of this article can be purchased on CEEOL

sssssssssssssssssssssssss

sssascasacsaas as ads asd adsads

asadasd

adsadsaasdadasdasd asdadasd

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More